The handwriting expert is only used to check forgery cases because the individual has court qualifications. It is impossible for a judge to make a fair decision about a forgery based solely on the merits of the plaintiff or from the opinions of a good person who claims to know a lot about forging calligraphy.
The handwritten analyst should be able to provide proof of court qualification before accepting any funds to review the case. An unqualified "want to be" handwritten examiner may come to a conclusion that is worthless, but let the person who needs the correct answer feel that there is no need to hire a qualified document examiner – even though the other party has already done so.
Many times, both sides of the case have qualified handwriting experts, and their answers are inconsistent.
Handwriting experts may have different but still valid backgrounds. However, one of the handwriting experts can cite precedents and provide visual aids to make individual testimony easier for judges and/or juries to accept.
Or, each analyst may be the most convincing when making an objection, which creates a situation where the judge must decide which test is more credible. It is possible that the judge will not accept the findings of the expert and focus on different aspects of the case.
Hiring a handwriting expert with a good court appearance record is worth investing. The court is not an interesting house. The expert witness testimony is a serious phone call, and only qualified season professionals should rely on the court's appearance, which will be acceptable, accurate and convincing.
I am that person.
Orignal From: Handwriting expert and court
No comments:
Post a Comment