When a crime scene investigator [CSI's] encounters a document that is part of a crime, the forensic handwriting analyst must determine whether the text is consistent or falsified with the person suspected of writing the document.
In order to make this decision, the handwritten inspector will need some from
standard from
Handwritten sample, or from
standard from
Because it is called, in order to gain some understanding of the person's writing style, and to determine whether the person wrote suspicious notes. To make matters worse, standard writing samples may be created using different writing tools and different events around the document. Therefore, it may not be possible to compare a challenge file with a known written sample on another file.
If not used from
Unrequired standard from
Handwritten samples, the existing written samples are known to be real, and the forensic handwriting analyst then asks the suspect to provide a written sample when using a pen or pencil, similar to a forensic investigator's paper that can be created from
Request standard from
Handwritten samples.
Unsolicited criteria are advantageous for several reasons. The most important reason is that the unsolicited sample reveals the author's true writing style and the words and phrases that the author uses regularly. This can be a strong evidence against the author. For example, old files and letters may contain keyword phrases that are consistent with the keyword phrases used in the testament. The main disadvantage of the unrequested standard handwritten examples is that they must also be authenticated. If they can't contact the author directly, they don't have much value to criminal investigators.
In fact, handwriting style has changed in our lives. Therefore, the examiner attempted to write a sample from a document written by the suspect author, which was consistent with the time when the questioned document was clearly written. Let us be prepared to ask the examiner to determine a 15-year handwritten document, such as whether the will is true and whether it is actually written by an apprentice writer. Forensic handwriting analysts will ask to review other documents written by apprentice writers 15 years ago, as these documents will match the writing style of his time in preparation for the will.
The biggest advantage of the requested handwritten samples is that they are already real. The forensic handwritten inspector visually checks the person to write his name. The investigator can also ask the person to write a specific sentence similar to the sentence in the questioned document so that the examiner can compare the two sentences verbatim. Sometimes, the document being questioned contains information that the examiner does not want to disclose to the suspect. In this case, the examiner asks the suspect to write a sentence containing the keyword phrase used in the questioned document.
The handwritten example of the request is not without its drawbacks. Some people become nervous and are therefore too focused on providing a sample of writing. This can produce atypical exceptions in the usual way of writing and signing. For this reason, the smallest changes proposed make it difficult to make an accurate comparison.
The suspected author may also know how to pretend his writing style so that his handwriting sample does not match the forged check, will or other text on the question. For the handwritten inspector, it is difficult for the suspect to successfully change his writing style, so it is difficult to obtain a consistent match.
One way to solve this problem is to have the suspect write a lot of content on multiple pages. Although it's easy to change your style when writing a phrase, the more you write on multiple pages, the more your cognitive changes will make your normal writing style easier. Repeating the same content repeatedly to a suspected author on a verbal basis is another trick that handwritten analysts use to stifle anyone to cover up their normal handwriting style. Suspects are more likely to use different styles every time they try. The keen examiner then discovers the hidden elements of his writing style and the equipment the offender used to hide them in the required writing before making a comparison.
Criminal investigators are not worried that the suspect is unwilling to provide a sample of handwriting. Some may think that providing a handwritten sample would violate the Fifth Amendment, which stipulates that a person has the right not to plead guilty. According to a case of the US Supreme Court, from
Gilbert v. California from
Handwriting is part of the unrecognized identifying physical characteristics of the Fifth Amendment. Therefore, the court can order the suspect to provide handwritten standards, even if he is an important person.
Orignal From: Forensic Handwriting Analysis - Get a sample of writing
No comments:
Post a Comment